The Dangers of Presidential Candidates Who Attack Based on Ethnic Background and Heritage ~ Use Your Brain

Trump uses garbage truck to needle Biden, Harris
Former President Donald Trump climbed inside a garbage truck in Wisconsin Wednesday as he continued to bash President Biden for his "garbage" comment. Trump told reporters, "You can't lead America if you don't love Americans." CBS News campaign reporter Jake Rosen has more.

‘Trump is showing us what a serial abuser does’: Sen. Warren on Trump’s comments about women
Elisabeth Warren, Democrat Senator from Massachusetts joins Nicolle Wallace on Deadline White House to discuss Donald Trump’s latest obscene comments about women and how they could impact undecided women 5 days out from the Election.

Lawrence: Using the language of Hitler, Trump calls Americans 'garbage' all the time
Last month, Donald Trump called Vice President Harris’ supporters “garbage.” As MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell points out, the news media ignored it. Lawrence compares the way the news media treats Donald Trump’s use of the word “garbage” after trying to turn President Biden’s use of the word “garbage” into a controversial news story.

The gaslighting never ends: Joe slams Trump's hypocrisy
In recent rallies, Donald Trump has made inflammatory remarks about former President Obama, VP Harris, journalist David Muir, Gen. Mark Milley, journalists at his rallies and more. The Morning Joe panel slams the hypocrisy over Trump's remarks and the reaction to recent remarks from President Biden about Trump supporters.

'They knew that women were going to die': Stories of abortion bans hurting women spark backlash
The story of a Texas woman who died because doctors were too afraid of crossing an abortion ban to give her treatment related to a miscarriage is the latest in a series of heartbreaking examples of how ill-considered abortion bans by activist politicians ignorant of the complications of reproductive biology. Each new story inspires a new level of anger and outrage from American women seeing their rights being stripped away at the cost of their health security. Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, and Jessica Valenti, author of "Abortion: Our bodies, their lies," discuss with Joy Reid and Alex Wagner.

‘They picked on the wrong people': Rosie Perez reacts to Puerto Rico comments at Trump rally
Actress Rosie Perez and Victor Martinez, Owner of Spanish Language radio station La Mega join Nicolle Wallace on Deadline White House with continued reaction to the comments from the Trump campaigns rally at Madison Square Garden and how it has ignited new energy from Latinos and Puerto Ricans in their opposition to Donald Trump.

Mika: Trump says he would protect women but his history suggests otherwise
Former President Trump in his Wednesday rally admitted his advisers told him not to say he would be the protector of women as president, yet he also doubled down on his remarks saying he would protect women whether they like it or not.

Trump’s ‘crassness, machismo’ in latest comments may give women ‘visceral’ reactions: Reporter
Former President Trump is receiving backlash for comments he made proclaiming he will “protect” women “whether they like it or not”. Washington Post reporter Ashley Parker and Politico reporter Eli Stokols discuss the impact of these comments on Trump’s election chances and the gender gap between candidates.

Whispering women strategize Trump's downfall with vital rights at stake
With women's reproductive freedom on the line in the 2024 election, women are networking with friends and family to spread the word about what's at stake. Jotaka Eaddy, founder of #WinWithBlackwomen, and Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand Action, discuss with Joy Reid and Alex Wagner.

Click here to read Trump says "whether the women like it or not, I'm going to protect them" at Wisconsin rally

Makes me think of other things he's said about forcing himself on others

Click here to read Trump Accused of Sexual Misconduct for the 28th Time

Click here to read These Are the Women Who Have Accused President Trump of Sexual Misconduct

Click here to read Myths or facts
Myths about rape, sexual assault, sexual abuse and other types of sexual violence cause serious harm. Here, we take a look at some of the most common myths – and separate fact from fiction.

Click here to read Sexual Assault Perpetrators' Justifications for Their Actions

In every democratic election, we expect our leaders to engage in robust debates about policy, governance, and the future of our nation. Healthy discourse helps us weigh ideas and choose who we think will best serve our country. But when presidential candidates resort to attacking others based on their ethnic background, heritage, or personal identity, the fabric of our democracy—and the values we hold dear—can become seriously threatened.

Undermining the Core Principles of Equality and Respect

At the heart of any democracy is the commitment to equality and respect for all people, regardless of race, ethnicity, or background. These principles are not just moral guidelines but the foundation of a society that values diversity and individual dignity. When a presidential candidate targets opponents or critics for their heritage, they erode these very principles. They send the message that some people, by the mere fact of their background, are less deserving of respect or are somehow less American.

Such attacks have a ripple effect. They fuel prejudice and embolden individuals who hold discriminatory beliefs to express those views openly. This creates a more hostile environment for marginalized communities, affecting their sense of safety and belonging. When our leaders, or those aspiring to be leaders, validate these biases, they set a tone that is divisive and toxic.

Distracting from Real Issues

Another critical danger of resorting to personal attacks is that it distracts from the real issues facing our country. Presidential elections should be an opportunity to discuss plans for improving healthcare, education, the economy, climate change, and national security. When candidates shift the focus to personal and identity-based attacks, meaningful conversations get sidelined. Voters are left with less clarity about where candidates stand on the issues that matter most.

Instead of fostering an informed electorate, candidates who engage in identity-based attacks often fuel a cycle of reaction and outrage. The result is a shallower political discourse where headlines are dominated by sensational remarks rather than thoughtful policy debates. This ultimately does a disservice to voters, who deserve to hear clear, well-reasoned plans for the future.

Weakening National Unity

Leaders should strive to unify the nation, even when differences of opinion are vast. Presidential candidates have the platform and influence to shape how we see each other and how we interact as a society. When a candidate attacks people based on their ethnic background or heritage, it divides us along lines that run deep in our history.

Rhetoric that plays on fears or biases can lead to increased tensions and misunderstandings among various groups. It weakens our sense of common purpose and belonging. In a country as diverse as ours, fostering unity is not just idealistic; it is essential for social cohesion and national strength. When leaders choose division, they leave behind a trail of distrust and animosity that can take years to mend.

Long-Term Consequences on Civic Engagement

Finally, such attacks can have lasting consequences on civic engagement, especially for younger generations and minority communities. When people feel that their identity or background makes them a target, they may become disillusioned with the political system. They may believe their voices are unwelcome or that participating in democracy won’t make a difference.

This disillusionment is dangerous. Our democracy thrives when all citizens feel empowered to engage, vote, and contribute. But when leaders promote an exclusionary vision of the nation, participation can decline, further weakening the democratic process.

A Call for Decency and Inclusivity

It is crucial for us, as voters, to demand better from our leaders. We should support candidates who engage in debates respectfully and prioritize uniting the nation rather than dividing it. Our diversity is our strength, and any rhetoric that undermines this truth should be swiftly challenged.

In choosing our leaders, let’s remember the kind of country we want to be—a nation that respects and embraces every individual, regardless of their heritage. Our democracy depends on it.